Welcome to DLA Help Group!

Lets Keep our DLA and AA!
Sunday 22 August 2010

 DLA Help Group Response

DLA Help Group
22/08/10


Welfare Reform

10 Points for Consideration




1. The Welfare and Benefits system needs reform. That much is agreed. The manner in which and the amount of the suggested cuts is what is an issue.

2. The Treasury has suggested a 20% reduction and the Coalition has portrayed the proposed cuts to Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), Housing Benefits and Disability Living Allowance (DLA) as (mainly) to address the levels of fraudulent and incorrect claims. Even if fraud and error were completely eliminated it comes nowhere near the expected 20% savings. This is clearly misleading information being put out to the media to portray all benefit claimants as feckless wasters.

3. The Coalition quotes (as did the previous administration) the research that showed that the majority of sick and disabled people actually wanted to work but could not because of various barriers. The oft heard commitment from Coalition members is that they wish to “help sick and disabled people back into work” by “support and encouragement”. The ESA however is not a benefit that “supports” or “encourages” the sick and disabled to find work. ESA divides the sick and disabled into 3 groups; an ironically named “Support” group (that will never be helped to find any work at all) and a Work Related Activity Group (the WRAG) that will be “encouraged and supported” by way of sanctions their benefit payments. The third group (which contains many people forced to appeal because their “medicals” were not done correctly) are the so called “fit for work”. In practice (because of the faulty nature of the “medicals”) this group comprises anything up to 50% of people who are not really fit for work at all, those who are ill but not recognised as ill etc. This includes a large proportion of mentally ill claimants. An immediate review of the medicals is therefore required above and beyond the Harrington Report.

4. The current contract for all medicals for both ESA and DLA costs £500m and is with Atos Origin. No proposal to cut this amount by 20% has been announced, why? Either Atos should provide 20% savings in line with the other proposed cuts or the contract should end and it be put out to tender.

5. Many of the cuts are to working age claimants benefits and affect the poor disproportionately. The proposed cuts to DLA especially are very harsh and if implemented at the 20% level would leave around 1m sick and disabled people without their main means of support. It would leave many unable to work and some without any possible means of transport or independence. A freeze in benefit levels for DLA would be preferable to any arbitrary cuts that would withdraw benefits altogether from huge numbers of claimants.

6. If the Coalition is serious about finding jobs for sick and disabled people there does not need to be any element of “stick” to the benefits paid. Rather there needs to be very much more “carrot” to facilitate sick and disabled people trying jobs. It is suggested that rather than a “taper” claimants need to be able to keep full benefits for at least a year to stabilise their new work pattern and return to simple benefit payments if it does not work for them with no penalty. There should be no “conditionality” for sick and disabled people who by all accounts want to work any way.

7. Employers need to be pursued with a “stick” approach if they fail to take training in employing sick and disabled people. A “carrot” approach would see tax breaks for good employers completing the course and employing a proportion of sick and disabled people.

8. Discrimination laws would need to be tightened and for the first time include provision for legal representation for employees. Carers to sick and disabled people should be included in anti discrimination legislation by name and definition.

9. If one of the stated objectives is to cut the fraud/error bill then more money needs to be spent on it, why has this not been identified?

10. Finally, the non means tested benefits for people with children and pensioners will inevitably have to become means tested maybe over a 5 year period.



This document is published by DLA Help Group - a group supporting DLA claimants since 2000.

All content © DLA Help Group 2010
ians1onSunday 22 August 2010 - 13:45:59
comment: 2

Go to page       >>  

News Archive


Call For Evidence: WCA Campaign ians1 @ (31 Jul : 11:04) (WCA Campaign)
Campaign to Save DLA ians1 @ (24 Jun : 11:09) (Misc)


Latest Forum Posts




Threads: 28 | Replies: 27 | Views: 6877

News Categories